TIP: Remember that because of the auxiliary être, the past participle must agree with the subject of the verb.Bonjour,
According to the following cases, there are some cases in which there is "no agreement with the subject" (either the agreement is with the object or there is no agreement at all):
- If no direct object complement (DOC), then agreement with subject (elle s'est brûlée);- If DOC before verb, then agreement with DOC (les doigts qu'elle s'est brûlés);
- If DOC after verb, then no agreement (elle s'est brûlé les doigts);
- If body parts are with à, then no DOC, then agreement with subject (il s'est brûlé aux doigts; elle s'est brûlée aux doigts; ils se sont brûlés aux doigts; elles se sont brûlées aux doigts)
Am I correct or I am missing sth? Thank you very much.
Fardin (French language learner)
Please help me to understand the meaning with an example. "mise en commun"
MISE EN COMMUN
Im just a bit confused since before i could always say Le ....... But now, they are correcting me, just because of the ''le''.
This never happended before, please explain to me, why this is happening?
Whew! I listened to this section a dozen times and was not anywhere close to that answer!
Maybe consider adding ¨hollywoodien¨ or something similar to the pre-lesson hints...?
Bonjour,
According to the following cases, there are some cases in which there is "no agreement with the subject" (either the agreement is with the object or there is no agreement at all):
- If no direct object complement (DOC), then agreement with subject (elle s'est brûlée);- If DOC before verb, then agreement with DOC (les doigts qu'elle s'est brûlés);
- If DOC after verb, then no agreement (elle s'est brûlé les doigts);
- If body parts are with à, then no DOC, then agreement with subject (il s'est brûlé aux doigts; elle s'est brûlée aux doigts; ils se sont brûlés aux doigts; elles se sont brûlées aux doigts)
Am I correct or I am missing sth? Thank you very much.
Fardin (French language learner)
"Wait, I'm passing Paul onto you."
What does this sentence mean? I'm not a native english speaker but this sentence makes no sense.
Based on the french sentence, I deduce it has something to do with a phone conversation.
Why not on est resté
or nous sommes restés
« On » is singular, grammatically speaking, like the impersonal/formal « one » in English, but in the example it appears to be being treated as plural « nous »
I would have thought On est restés was incorrect.
I am confused about when I can use duquel ,delaquelle etc instead of dont
Hi, in
“Autre ancienne élève de l'émission de télé-crochet de M6 ayant rencontré le succès”,
why is “ayant rencontré” used? Could “avoir rencontré” have been used instead? Would the meaning then be different?
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level