I do not understand why it would be il aurait allé and not il serait allé

sue c.C1Kwiziq Q&A regular contributor

I do not understand why it would be il aurait allé and not il serait allé

This question relates to:French lesson "Conjugate regular -er, -ir, -dre verbs (+ avoir) in the conditional past in French (Le Conditionnel Passé)"

Asked 7 years ago

AurélieKwiziq team memberCorrect answer

Bonjour Sue !

The lesson says "regular -er verbs", which doesn't include "aller", as it belongs to the "+ être" verbs :)

Like07 years ago

sue c. asked:View original

I do not understand why it would be il aurait allé and not il serait allé

Sign in to submit your answer

Don't have an account yet? Join today

« In example 2 why you say Ce produit est inférieur au nôtre. And did not say inférieur à notre,,Mark asked: "Hi, why do we say "par amour" and not "pour amour" (for love) ?" »

Kwizbot, a friendly bot

Find your French level for FREE

Test your French to the CEFR standard

Find your French level

I'll be right with you...