I do not understand why it would be il aurait allé and not il serait allé

SueC1Kwiziq Q&A regular contributor

I do not understand why it would be il aurait allé and not il serait allé

This question relates to:French lesson "Conjugate regular -er, -ir, -dre verbs (+ avoir) in Le Conditionnel Passé (past conditional)"

Asked 2 years ago

Like1Answer1

AurélieKwiziq team member

Bonjour Sue ! The lesson says "regular -er verbs", which doesn't include "aller", as it belongs to the "+ être" verbs :)

Like02 years ago

Sue asked:View original

I do not understand why it would be il aurait allé and not il serait allé

Sign in to submit your answer

Don't have an account yet? Join today

« In example 2 why you say Ce produit est inférieur au nôtre. And did not say inférieur à notre,,Mark asked: "Hi, why do we say "par amour" and not "pour amour" (for love) ?" »

Ask a question

Find your French level for FREE

Test your French to the CEFR standard

Find your French level >>

I'll be right with you...