Prepositions
Almut
Kwiziq community member
15/05/16
I guess the preposition (one of location! so "pour" wouldn't count anyway) is a good indicator that it is the intransitive version of the verb but the intransitive version of the verb does not necessarily demand a preposition. However the lack of a direct object shows that "retourner" is used intransitively here and therefore has to be conjugated with "être".
Aaron
Kwiziq community member
5/08/16
"Pour" is optional in this case, as far as I understand it. For the sake of translation, "le voir" is already equivalent to "to see it", but you could add "pour".
"Il vient nous sauver" = "il vient pour nous sauver".
There may be a slight nuance, but it's essentially the same.
"Il vient nous sauver" = "il vient pour nous sauver".
There may be a slight nuance, but it's essentially the same.
Peter
Kwiziq community member
16/02/18
+1
Your answer
Don't have an account yet? Join today
Think you've got all the answers?
Test your French to the CEFR standard
find your French level »2928questions6050answers122,905users
Joakim
Kwiziq community member
8 May 2016
3 replies
Prepositions
"Marie est retournée le voir le lendemain" - how come there's no preposition ("pour", say) following retournée here, which the lesson says should always follow retourner when conjugated with être?
This relates to:
Retourner can be used with avoir or être in Le Passé Composé... and changes meaning -